CCPHA has led many of California’s most successful and groundbreaking statewide obesity prevention policy campaigns. Our full 2015 legislative agenda is now available here. We encourage you to join our Statewide Advocacy Network.
Statewide Menu Labeling at Chain Restaurants, 2008 (SB 1420, Padilla). This bill made California the first state in the nation to require menu labeling at chain restaurants. The law begins implementation in 2009 when restaurants chains with 20 or more outlets in the state must make nutritional brochures available at the point of sale. By 2011, restaurants must post calorie information directly on menus and menu boards. CCPHA and the American Cancer Society sponsored SB 1420. For a list of SB 1420 supporters, click here. See how your legislator voted on SB 1420 and read a summary of the bill and the full text of the bill. For more information on menu labeling, see Menu Labeling in the Resources section of our web site.
School Junk Food Ban, 2005 (SB 12, Escutia). SB 12 established the most rigorous nutrition standards in the country for food sold anywhere on school campuses outside the school meal program. The law, which goes into effect July 1, 2007, established limits on fat and sugar content and portion size on all foods sold a la carte, in vending machines or school stores, or as part of a school fundraiser. SB 12 was sponsored by the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, the California School Boards Association, Governor Schwarzenegger, and many other co-sponsors and supporters. Find out how your legislator voted on SB 12, and read a bill summary or the full text of the bill. Read this case study about the advocacy process that led to this legislative victory.
High School Soda Ban, 2005 (SB 965, Escutia). Reducing soda consumption is one of the most promising strategies for addressing the epidemic of overweight children. This bill defined school beverage standards for high schools, eliminating the sale of soda and other sweetened beverages on high school campuses in California. Similar standards had already been established for elementary and middle schools through SB 677 (Ortiz, 2003, see below). Half of the beverages sold on high school campuses must meet these standards by July 1, 2007. All beverages sold on high school campuses must meet these standards by July 1, 2009. SB 965 was sponsored by Governor Schwarzenegger and had a long list of supporters. Find out how your legislator voted on SB 965, and read a bill summary or the full text of the bill. Read this case study about the advocacy process that led to this legislative victory.
Marketing to Children, 2004 (SJR 29 Kuehl). In 2004 CCPHA successfully sponsored a resolution that called upon Congress to take steps to curtail unhealthy marketing to children. The Resolution and its accompanying fact sheet provide information on the problem of marketing to children as well as proposed actions to remedy the problem.
K-8 Soda Ban, 2003 (SB 677 Ortiz). This bill, which went into effect July 1, 2004, ensures that only healthy beverages are sold on elementary, middle and junior high school campuses. Reducing soda consumption is one of the most promising strategies for preventing obesity. Find out how your legislator voted on SB 677, read a bill summary, view the full text of the bill, and learn about the negative health effects of soda consumption.
School Food Standards, 2001 (SB 19 Escutia). SB 19 established a statewide pilot program to determine the financial impact on schools that implement rigorous nutrition standards for foods and beverages sold outside of the school meal program (foods sold a la carte, in vending machines, in school stores and as fundraisers). The pilot program showed that middle and high schools could implement nutrition standards without any loss of revenue. Some schools even made more money selling healthy foods than they did selling unhealthy foods. The statute would have also established nutrition standards for foods sold at elementary schools had the legislature increased school meal reimbursements. Unfortunately, the legislature did not increase meal reimbursements.